[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
Michael Scherer
misc at zarb.org
Mon Mar 14 21:49:13 CET 2011
Le dimanche 13 mars 2011 à 21:09 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
> Le dimanche 13 mars 2011 21:01:15, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
> > sön 2011-03-13 klockan 21:55 +0200 skrev Tux99:
> > > During the review with my mentor Anssi of one of the packages I'm working
> > > on, the question came up what the appropriate repository for a package is
> > > that's both non-free (open source but not a FOSS license) and tainted
> > > (contains sw. that is covered by patents in some parts of the world).
> > >
> > > Should a non-free+tainted package go in tainted, i.e. is the tainted repo
> > > for all tainted packages, both free and non-free
> >
> > tainted, as thats a "bigger" issue than nonfree
> >
> > --
> > Thomas
>
> I would have said the opposite, so that using core + tainted you're sure to
> get free software :)
The same.
Ie, a non-free may have more stringent distribution requirements than a
free software.
PLF started as a way to distribute free softwares, the non-free part was
added later as we wanted to separate the 2 ( during a meeting in
Vienna ).
--
Michael Scherer
More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list