[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name

Pascal Terjan pterjan at gmail.com
Wed Sep 5 13:27:38 CEST 2012


On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
>> 'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble:
>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> By the way, there are some builds that get a strangely reported build
>>>> duration (15588 days; always the same value when it occurs). I didn't
>>>> investigate yet.
>>
>> So 15588 would be days since epoch. I guess it's the same as Pascal's
>> comment. If it was submitted over 2 days ago we might not read the
>> submit time and it ends up getting a timestamp of 0 and thus 15588 days
>> to build.
>
> Ok. So at this point (where we do a find to get the files), what's the
> good approach: just leave the package/build out of the list if we
> can't get its name (that's the new behaviour in my pending new index
> page) or fix the find to get all? I'd say the former.

Yes that's fine

> Two others things that are aside this very point:
>
> * we could gain more insight over the whole submission/build process
> if we could store data about way past builds (not necessarily the full
> details of each build, at least not right now, but at least the
> basics: when, who, what package, how long it took on which host, what
> was the result). One way to do it would be to have a database in which
> we can push and update info about each submission, as it happens
> (today, everything is only in the filesystem). What control points
> would need to be modified to push information into such a database?

Ulri would probably be enough expect for upload, so maybe ulri + emi
But then it would be better to instead use that as reference in
ulri/emi instead of looking through the filesystem :)

> * today, submissions are shown simply by src package. Should we show
> submission results per arch? (what if i586 passes and x86_64 fails for
> instance).

It can not happen unless there is a bug, they are submitted together


More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list