[Mageia-discuss] Vote for board
molch.b at googlemail.com
Mon Mar 12 09:29:48 CET 2012
2012/3/12 Remco Rijnders <remco at webconquest.com>:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:34:14AM +0100, Maarten wrote in
> <201203120834.14471.alien at rmail.be>:
>> Op maandag 12 maart 2012 07:56:30 schreef Remco Rijnders:
>>> While I support the candidacy of both candidates (if I have a say in it,
>>> don't know), but I think there still needs to be some sort of
>>> Imagine if someone unsuitable would volunteer and we have seats
>>> Do we want to let them in unopposed?
>> I agree.
>> But otoh:
>> Since only association members vote for board, and i think i see several
>> leaders already agreeing and noone disagreeing... i think this would
>> as being acclamated...
>> i guess if this sort of procedure is being followed, all that is needed is
>> timelimit for someone to disagree and then the email of stating if the new
>> members are accepted...
> I think what I tried to say... it is good to have the policies and
> procedures clear up front and to stick to them, even when they might seem
> overly bureaucratic to us now. In the future, when we might face issues, it
> is good to have established procedures we can point to instead of having
> people claim "but you did x back then".
That was the point of my mail. Avoiding possible future discussions.
More information about the Mageia-discuss