[Mageia-discuss] Vote for board

Michael Scherer misc at zarb.org
Mon Mar 12 12:49:27 CET 2012

Le lundi 12 mars 2012 à 08:40 +0100, Remco Rijnders a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:34:14AM +0100, Maarten wrote in 
> <201203120834.14471.alien at rmail.be>:
> >Op maandag 12 maart 2012 07:56:30 schreef Remco Rijnders:
> >[...]
> >> While I support the candidacy of both candidates (if I have a say in it, I
> >> don't know), but I think there still needs to be some sort of acclamation.
> >> Imagine if someone unsuitable would volunteer and we have seats available?
> >> Do we want to let them in unopposed?
> >
> >I agree.
> >
> >But otoh:
> >
> >Since only association members vote for board, and i think i see several team
> >leaders already agreeing and noone disagreeing... i think this would qualify
> >as being acclamated...
> >
> >i guess if this sort of procedure is being followed, all that is needed is a
> >timelimit for someone to disagree and then the email of stating if the new
> >members are accepted...
> I think what I tried to say... it is good to have the policies and 
> procedures clear up front and to stick to them, even when they might seem 
> overly bureaucratic to us now. In the future, when we might face issues, 
> it is good to have established procedures we can point to instead of 
> having people claim "but you did x back then".

Nice try, but as seen on -dev, when i try to follow the procedure and
rules, people complain, and when i don't, people ask me to do so.

Michael Scherer

More information about the Mageia-discuss mailing list