[Mageia-discuss] Upgrade problem

[Kevin R. Bulgrien]

On Thursday, April 12, 2012 06:43:58 am Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:37:56 -0500
> 
> "Kevin R. Bulgrien" <kbulgrien at att.net> wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 12, 2012 04:51:05 am Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:18:18 +0200
> > > 
> > > Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> > > > Une erreur est survenue pendant l'installation des paquetages :
> > > > 
> > > > le fichier /usr/include/openssl/cms.h de l'installation de
> > > > lib64openssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.3.mga1.x86_64 entre en conflit avec le
> > > > fichier du paquetage libopenssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.2.mga1.i586
> > > > 
> > > > le fichier /usr/include/openssl/cms.h de l'installation de
> > > > libopenssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.3.mga1.i586 entre en conflit avec le
> > > > fichier du paquetage lib64openssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.2.mga1.x86_64
> > > 
> > > I removed libopenssl-devel so that the upgrade goes fine.
> > > Now I can't reinstall it:
> > > https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365
> > > 
> > > Damn.
> > > 
> > > Antoine.
> > 
> > What happens when you run:
> > 
> > $ urpmq --whatprovides libopenssl-devel
> > 
> > Are two different names displayed?  If so, can you install by using the
> > more detailed name?
> 
> $ urpmq --whatprovides libopenssl-devel
> lib64openssl-devel|lib64openssl-devel|lib64openssl-devel|lib64openssl-devel
> 
> Which doesn't look right to me.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Antoine.

How about the output of:

$ urpmq --list-media