[Mageia-artwork] [Mageia-Artwork}

[Donald Stewart]

On 21 April 2011 09:15, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Donald,
>
> thanks for the update!
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 13:10, Donald Stewart <watersnowrock at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Kspalsh; is done and sorted
>> Gsplash; appears to not exist and upstream have deleted it. So a
>> decision on that is still needed.
>
> >From here and/or packagers?
>
>> KDM; requires a fix on the default backgrounds
>> GDM; not sure about it, check later
>>
>> Backgrounds; there are a number of wrongs symlinks and a few other
>> parts could be cleaned out. Also an update on backgrounds-extra? A
>> decision for final on whither or not we go with static or dynamic
>> backgrounds should be made. As the current dynamic setup adds load on
>> the system for nothing as all the images are the same with no
>> progression.
>
> But is the load noticeable (happens hourly at most, right?).
>
>> Sadly I cant attend the next meeting, so it would be great if you
>> could discuss the static/dynamic issue, if we choose dynamic I have
>> the new images ready to upload.
>
> So go for it.
>
> Romain
> _______________________________________________
> Mageia-artwork mailing list
> Mageia-artwork at mageia.org
> https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-artwork
>

Upstream have removed it, so we need to decide if we are ok with not
having gsplash, can any gnome users comment on this?

I'm not sure of the time changes, but I have heard that it can add
~10% to constant cpu load which suggests that the images are
constantly transitioned.

Donald