[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

[sorteal at gmail.com]

Just a suggestion but what about possible LTS releases. Similar to say Ubuntu
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: Sinner from the Prairy <sinnerbofh at gmail.com>
Sender: mageia-dev-bounces at mageia.org
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:05:46 
To: <mageia-dev at mageia.org>
Reply-To: Mageia development mailing-list <mageia-dev at mageia.org>
Subject: Re: [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

atilla ontas wrote:

> I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model.

(...)

> One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do
> we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and
> suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using
> code names.
 
> What's your opinion?

I'd like 2 releases a year, plus a naming convention similar to current one 
(2010.0, 2010.1).

It makes it easy to figure out which version to install (think newcomer). 
Also, I'd like to not do "Spring" "Fall"... , as Spring in the North is 
Autumn in the South.

Think globally.


Salut,
Sinner