[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
Frederic Janssens
fjanss at gmail.com
Wed Dec 22 13:55:02 CET 2010
On 2010-12-22, Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
> Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 00:32 +0100, Frederic Janssens a écrit :
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 17:07, Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Le mardi 14 décembre 2010 à 17:05 +0100, Dexter Morgan a écrit :
>> > > I would like to have your input to let us able to provide a bugzilla
>> > > really soon
>> >
>> > So if I am not wrong, in bugzilla, we have :
>> > - products
>> > - component, contained in products
>> > - and various field, per bug,
>> >
>> > and the way we organize everything will impact the layout.
>> >
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> In preparation of the future interaction (by xmlrpc) between the
>> mageia-app-db site and the mageia bugzilla, I have been testing
>> http://bugs.mageia.org/ .
>> Xmlrpc works, but it will be necessary to configure additional fields.
>> The minimum would be to add an 'RPM Package' field (such as exists on
>> https://qa.mandriva.com/).
>
> What about component not related to rpm ?
The 'RPM Package' field would be left blank.
(usually many fields are left blank)
>
> And do you mean srpm or rpm ?
On https://qa.mandriva.com/ anything goes.
To permit consistent searches I think we should standardise.
The aim would to be to as specific as needed but not more;
as far as I know that would be :
name-version-release
unless the bug is architecture specific, where we would have :
name-version-release.architecture
>
> We should also take in account package naming change.
which change?
>
> --
> Michael Scherer
>
>
--
Frederic
More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list