[Mageia-dev] Missing packages

[Ahmad Samir]

On 21 July 2011 08:51, Jani Välimaa <jani.valimaa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/7/21 Ahmad Samir <ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com>
>>
>> On 21 July 2011 05:50, Thomas Spuhler <thomas at btspuhler.com> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 08:21:40 pm Thomas Spuhler wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 01:55:28 am Anne nicolas wrote:
>> >> > Hi there
>> >> >
>> >> > Usual mail on missing packages. Please have a look on that list to
>> >> > decrease it: http://check.mageia.org/dependencies.html
>> >> >
>> >> > This is important to clean this list. Please report on this thread
>> >> > anything you do for it.
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers
>> >>
>> >> I have several (The horde related) and it will take some time to get
>> >> this
>> >> all done. there are about 30 packages I need to redo and the names all
>> >> cahnge to a php-pear-Horde_Cxxxx style
>> >> then there is the perlapi-5.12.2 which comes from swish-e that doesn't
>> >> build on a 32 bit system. I am working with upstream to get it fixed,
>> >> but
>> >> they take their time.
>> >> But there is one package I have a problem I cannot explain and I would
>> >> like
>> >> some help:
>> >> php-pear-channel-symfony
>> >> I have build this package twice with, well at least the system says so
>> >> (
>> >> and I can install it locally), but it never makes it over to the
>> >> mirrors.
>> >> I checked the spelling, compared it with other channel packages,
>> >> compared
>> >> it to SUSE and all looks good.
>> >> If someone find a little spare time... it would be appreciated
>> >
>> > I found this:
>> > php-pear-channel-symfony found in incorrect media core.x86_64 (allowed
>> > core.i586)      error
>> >
>> > Why did it go to core.x86_64 it's a noarch package
>> > How do I move (or remove) this?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thomas
>> >
>>
>> noarch packages are copied to both i586 and x86_64 repos, so the error
>> on http://check.mageia.org/dependencies.html doesn't make sense to me.
>>
>> Another issue it php-pear-channel-symfony provides and obsoletes
>> _itself_, this is wrong, IIUC. (I've submitted a new package fixing
>> this issue).
>>
>
> IIRC, It's a known problem that if you obsolete noarch package it's only
> removed from i586 repos.
>

That probably explains the issue; the new package is no available on both archs.

> --
> Jani Välimaa
>



-- 
Ahmad Samir