[Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3

Dexter Morgan dmorganec at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 12:15:12 CEST 2011


2011/6/9 JA Magallón <jamagallon at ono.com>:
> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:49:18 +0100, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
>
>> 'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 09/06/11 10:25 did gyre and gimble:
>> > 2011/6/9 JA Magallón <jamagallon at ono.com>:
>> >>
>> >> No need, Cauldron is Cauldron. The only strange thing is that I had
>> >> heard on other threads that update to Gnome 3 was being discussed,
>> >> but never realized it had finally agreed on.
>> >
>> > Same here, I'm a bit surprised.
>>
>> We're on the next cycle now. Quite frankly I'd be stunned (and hugely
>> disappointed) if we *didn't* have Gnome 3!
>>
>> Providing a Gnome2 environment or not is likely the point that need
>> discussion :D
>>
> +1
>
> One question:
>
> xps:/etc/X11/wmsession.d# ll
> total 16
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 131 2011.06.08 11:00 02GNOME
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 116 2011.03.25 00:36 06Xfce
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 177 2011.06.08 11:31 11GNOME3
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 118 2011.02.07 22:12 29drak3d
> xps:/etc/X11/wmsession.d# rpm -qf *
> gnome-session-3.0.1-1.mga2
> xfce-utils-4.8.1-5.mga1
> gnome-shell-3.0.2-1.mga2
> drak3d-1.30-1.mga1
>
> What is the difference between bot gnomes ? IE, gnome-session and
> gnome-shell-session ?
>
> Now we don't have gnome 2 (gnome 3 uninstalled almost everything), so ?

can you do a rpm -qf for  02GNOME please ?


More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list