[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion

Anne nicolas ennael at mageia.org
Tue Jun 14 20:00:39 CEST 2011


2011/6/14 Wolfgang Bornath <molch.b at googlemail.com>

> 2011/6/14 Anne nicolas <ennael at mageia.org>:
> >
> > I guess because of Mandriva policy. We did provide backports but it was
> > explicitely said to be unsupported. "Use it at your own risks"
> > We may have to rewrite  this and make things clear
>
> Do you mean, just telling people that it is no risk or do you mean a
> change which lessens the risk?
>

not at all


> As Michael wrote earlier in this thread, if there was the risk to
> break the system by low quality of backports then the quality has to
> be improved (not his own words but that's how I understood it).
>
> exactly what I had in mind. Having backports can allow choice between "the
last version of" and "the stable version with which I'm happy
 with". But indeed we need more quality in backport rpms that is policy and
tests.

--
> wobo
>



-- 
Anne
http://www.mageia.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/c3c82ec2/attachment.html>


More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list