[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
Maarten Vanraes
maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
Tue Jun 14 22:27:39 CEST 2011
Op dinsdag 14 juni 2011 18:08:17 schreef Patricia Fraser:
> Hi,
>
> 2c from the marcomm team...
>
> > Proposal 1:
> > 6 months release cycle -> 12 months life cycle
> > ( Fedora, Ubuntu, Mandriva < 2010.1 && Mandriva != 2006.0 )
> >
> > Proposal 2:
> > 9 months release cycle -> 18 months life cycle
> > ( ~ opensuse and the one we used for Mageia 1 )
> >
> > Proposal 3:
> > 12 months release cycle -> 24 months life cycle
> > ( Mandriva > 2010.1 )
>
> The only reason for marcomm to take a position is that a release is a
> nice hook on which to hang another round of publicity.
>
> I think 9 months is good; it gives us a good amount of time to plan
> whatever marketing/comms work is needed for release time, but it's
> not too long so we fall out of the public consciousness altogether.
>
> And there are other things about us to publicise besides releases, so
> we can fill in the gaps nicely!
>
> Cheers,
ah yes, i didn't think about this at all... this alone is enough reason to do
a proper release cycle (instead of the rolling releases which seemed to have
found a way in this thread)
a +3 is in order here.
More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list