[Mageia-dev] (second attempt) suggesting sectool be dropped
mageia at colin.guthr.ie
Fri Nov 18 11:37:10 CET 2011
'Twas brillig, and Claire Robinson at 17/11/11 12:49 did gyre and gimble:
> On 17/11/11 10:26, Michael scherer wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:39:29AM +0100, Florian Hubold wrote:
>>> Am 15.11.2011 07:29, schrieb Michael Scherer:
>>>> Le lundi 14 novembre 2011 à 22:09 -0800, Robert M. Riches Jr. a écrit :
>>>>> (New list subscriber...needed to fix registered email address to
>>>>> I was asked to submit this suggestion to the mailing list:
>>>>> As a Mageia user, I believe msec was much better off with_OUT_
>>>>> sectool. In its present state, sectool is BADLY broken. It
>>>>> whines for pages about file permissions that are exactly as they
>>>>> should be.
>>>> Can you be more specific ?
>>> It think he means this: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2808
>>> or https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2255#c21 or
>>> I've also become supportive of this, sectool is basically duplicating
>>> partly msec functionality, there was no adaption for Mageia,
>>> currently it's
>>> checking on Mageia with the upstream Fedora configuration.
>>> Honestly this should have been done when importing it, as
>>> tmb already mentioned. msec should be patched to not require it.
>>> When we can't even get our default security tool to work properly,
>>> what's the point in adding a second one which needs even more
>> As you say, the question is again "why was it uploaded in the first
>> It seems some packages were uploaded, and there seemed to have not enough
>> tests. While that's hard or impossible to avoid totally, that's not
>> the way to achieve a good distribution :/
>> I neither use msec or sectool, so I personnaly do not care that much.
>> Afaik, sectool was created by a ex mandriva/mandrake guy ( vincent
>> danen ),
>> because he was ( rightfully ) wanting to rewrite msec, who is/was
>> a mess of bash + python + perl code ( and rather ugly code, afaik,
>> last time
>> I took a look ), but if msec is supported, and sectool is not, then I
>> we could drop. However, I still think we should first attempt to
>> and fix it. ( ie, always have the reflex of "try to fix and
>> collaborate" ).
> As one of the people who tested it and the one who filed the bug linked
> to above which expresses the need for it to be configured, I object to
> this being blamed on QA! It seems we are kicked whenever anything is wrong.
> I believe it is assigned to those higher up to provide a proper
> The bug was dated 22nd September and as yet no configuration exists.
> That does not reflect well on the distribution, not that QA haven't
> performed sufficient testing, which we obviously did.
Knowing misc a little bit I don't think for a second he was intending to
blame QA team here.
More the initial "blind import" (which was a hard time to do overly much
testing as I'm sure all will agree!) without properly checking things then.
So please don't take it personally, I really don't think he was
targeting you :)
Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
More information about the Mageia-dev