[Mageia-dev] missing deps, lash rebuilt for texi2html

[Philippe DIDIER]

Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
> Thomas Spuhler a écrit :
>> On Saturday, October 15, 2011 07:16:19 pm Philippe DIDIER wrote:
>>> Thomas Spuhler a écrit :
>>>> I just rebuilt lash. In order to get it built, I had to remove
>>>> -%{python_sitelib}/*
>>>> Can someone who uses it please test it?
>>>
>>> In the previous build (march)
>>> python-lash rpm was created
>>> it could install a directory
>>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/
>>> wich contained 4 files
>>>   _lash.a
>>>   _lash.la
>>>   _lash.so
>>>   lash.py
>>>
>>>
>>> You said you had to remove -%{python_sitelib}/* in the spec file
>>> because there was nothing there (so your python-lash rpm seems to be
>>> empty !)
>>> If nothing was created in the buildroot (and no file found to be
>>> packaged) it's perhaps a problem of config : if python was not found
>>> (configure.ac seems to look for a path to PYTHON 2.3 !!! ) this these 4
>>> files were not created and there's indeed nothing to install...
>>>
>>> Perhaps a problem with the update of python since july ?
>>>
>>> Did you get an error message complaining about a missing optional
>>> dependency (even if that doesn't prevent to "make" what is not optional
>>>
>>> : configure seems to allow to make without creating python-lash)
>>
>> No, I didn't see any error messages.
> 
> 
> It really looks as if the python path was not found ... (configure looks
> for python path with this list : python2 python2.5 python2.4 python2.3
> python2.2 python2.1 python2.0 python1.6 python1.5)
> The python version in mageia is 2.7 !!!
> 
> if no python path is found configure may disable pylash building
> 
> You may look in the log and try to find :
> build_pylash="disabled"
> It may be disabled without warning !!! as it doesn't prevent from
> building the other components
> but when creating the rpm python-lash you have no file to put into it
> 
> Suppressing the line :
> -%{python_sitelib}/*
> in the spec file hides the symptom and provides an empty and useless rpm
> 
> That's my hypothesis but I'm not very able !
> Maybe you may ask to an old packager !!!
> 
> 
> 
Funda Wang is our silent guardian angel :
He just fixed it (and we may see how he could in revision 155500)!

Thanks Funda