[Mageia-dev] GNOME 2 panel applets

andre999 andre999mga at laposte.net
Mon Jan 2 23:15:34 CET 2012


Olav Vitters a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:05:34AM -0500, andre999 wrote:
>    
>> Olav Vitters a écrit :
>>      
>>> Inhttps://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133, the reporter is asking
>>> to add dockbarx, a panel applet for GNOME 2.
>>>
>>> Being involved with GNOME, in my opinion this is a WONTFIX. There is no
>>> GNOME 2 in Mageia, and GNOME 3 fallback mode might go away, plus the
>>> panel API changed slightly (because it uses dbus now instead of bonobo).
>>>
>>> No clue if dockbarx works with fallback mode btw.
>>>        
>> Some users report that it does, both in gnome-panel and standalone mode.
>>      
>>> What do others think?
>>>        
> I don't really understand your post, could you clarify a bit?
>    

OK
I followed the link in the bug report, to various other links.
According to the developers, the dockbarx works as an applet in 
gnome-panel, as well as a stand-alone mode, not requiring gnome-panel.  
They have images on their site of various themes available, some in 
standalone mode, super-imposed on the gnome-panel.
As well, the developers are porting dockbarx to gtk3 and xfce.

There are various links to user comments.  Some of these links confirm 
variously that dockbarx works under gnome-classic, in both gnome-panel 
and stand-alone mode.
Note that most of the feedback was from ubuntu users, which from the 
comments seems to be on Gnome3.
>> My first reaction was, being a Gnome user myself, that if everything
>> is as stated, I tend to agree.
>> But following the links, as well as working under gnome-shell, and
>> having a stand-alone mode, it works with compiz (which will appeal
>> to some users), and there are ports under development for gtk3 and
>> xfce.
>>      
> What works with compiz? GNOME shell does not. You mean dockbarx?
Right

>   It is
> an applet, right? How would it be able to work with GNOME shell? What do
> you mean with stand-alone mode?
>    

As noted above and in my initial comment (which obviously wasn't clear), 
there is a stand-alone mode which does not require Gnome panel

>> It seems to be a sort of configurable icon-based menu system.
>> There is no feature list as such, nor proposed new features, so it
>> is a little uncertain what are it's limitations.
>> But why not ?
>>      
> Why not: if GNOME 2: will not work. If GNOME 3 API: fallback mode will
> likely be removed. So you're adding something wile you might not have it
> for long.
>    

Firstly, the fallback mode will be around for a little while.
And the developers are working on ports to gtk3 and xfce, so assuming 
that that continues, dockbarx won't be dependant on fallback mode.
However, projects don't always continue, even although it was started in 
2009, and under development in November.
BTW, the developers do mention that dockbarx will require some changes 
to work directly under the Gnome 3 api.
Also, I understand that this is not immediately evident, as they don't 
have a feature list on their site, nor a development milestone.  Their 
site could use a little more coherence.

I'm not necessarily saying that we should import it.
Only that it is not restricted to Gnome 2.  In the short term with 
fallback mode, and according to the long-term goals of the developers.
If everyone else thinks that we should say wontfix for now, I don't have 
a problem with that.
> Just asking for input btw. If others think it is a good idea, then I'll
> just not close the bug.
>
>    
Regards :)

-- 
André



More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list