[Mageia-dev] %{_unitdir} after /usr move
Colin Guthrie
mageia at colin.guthr.ie
Tue Jul 24 17:29:38 CEST 2012
'Twas brillig, and nicolas vigier at 24/07/12 15:35 did gyre and gimble:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>
>> 'Twas brillig, and Olav Vitters at 24/07/12 15:11 did gyre and gimble:
>>> $ rpm -E '%{_unitdir}'
>>> /lib/systemd/system
>>>
>>> This should show:
>>> /usr/lib/systemd/system
>>>
>>> I see that it is defined in two places:
>>> 1. /etc/rpm/macros.d/20build.macros: %_unitdir /lib/systemd/system
>>> 2. /usr/lib/rpm/macros.systemd: %_unitdir /usr/lib/systemd/system
>>>
>>> The latter obviously provides the right setting. But I guess due to
>>> ordering and so on it picks up the setting from 20build.macros.
>>>
>>> This is preventing me to package NetworkManager properly (I prefer
>>> relying on %{_unitdir} to give me the location, so the spec still works
>>> on Mageia 2).
>>>
>>> Could someone fix this?
>>
>> Yeah this was on my to-fix list.
>>
>> As far as I'm aware the file in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.systemd will not be
>> looked at at all anyway as it's not in any kind of magical .d folder.
>>
>> I would like to see the following changes:
>>
>> 1) We define a /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/ folder.
>> 2) Any packages shipping file in the /etc/ folder should change and use
>> /usr/lib instead (/etc should be for admin overrides, NOT for general
>> packaging).
>> 3) We include the systemd macos in the /usr/lib/rpm/macos.d/ folder.
>
> This looks like a good idea.
Cool.
>> 4) Any files shipping systemd units require systemd-devel to ensure they
>> have the macro.
>>
>>
>> While steps 1-3 are probably OK (just need work) I'm not sure if
>> requiring systemd-devel is overkill when all they need is a small part
>> of it. I could potentially create a systemd-unit-devel package which
>> only contained the neccesary stuff which would be lighter on the
>> requirements front but I'm also against too much fragmentation here, so
>> I'd be tempted to just say "require systemd-devel" and sod the
>> not-strictly-necessary stuff it might end up pulling in.
>
> Are you talking about buildrequires ?
Yeah, sorry, this was all on the BuildRequires front. Like I said, I'm
fairly tempted to just make such packages BuildRequire systemd-devel and
forget about it rather than spend time splitting things up just to save
a few seconds on the build time.
Col
--
Colin Guthrie
colin(at)mageia.org
http://colin.guthr.ie/
Day Job:
Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
Open Source:
Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list