[Mageia-dev] bug, omission or feature

Wolfgang Bornath molch.b at googlemail.com
Sun Jun 3 15:17:28 CEST 2012

2012/6/3 AL13N <alien at rmail.be>:
> Op zondag 3 juni 2012 14:04:07 schreef Wolfgang Bornath:
>> 2012/6/3 Jani Välimaa <jani.valimaa at gmail.com>:
>> > On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
>> >> I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
>> >> unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
>> >> the point?
>> >
>> > New and unique subject isn't always enough. There's still some headers
>> > from message which you presumably used with Reply button to get mailing
>> > list address and then erased the message box.
>> >
>> > To: Mageia development mailing-list <mageia-dev at mageia.org>
>> > References: <4FCB1DA9.1070308 at gmail.com>
>> > In-Reply-To: <4FCB1DA9.1070308 at gmail.com>
>> Well, normally I do not look at the extended header. In my mailer the
>> message by Richard came in as new message, not within an older thread.
>> That's why I also replied that I do not see any hijacked Thread.
>> Looking at the references show 2 references but i never received the
>> mails with these references.
> [...]
> it's Anne's mail with subject: [Mageia-dev] Mageia 2 and Cauldron updated with
> proper design

Ok, I received that. Conclusion:
My mail client (Googlemail online) does not honor references, splits
threads by subject only. New experience.


More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list