[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)

Angelo Naselli anaselli at linux.it
Wed Jun 13 13:52:48 CEST 2012

mercoledì 13 giugno 2012 alle 00:53, nicolas vigier ha scritto:
> We are talking about backports, not updates, so we don't care about
> versionning policy of updates. And backports can have higher version
> than 'release' repository of next version, that's what this thread is
> about.
??? The policy should be the *same*, otherwise you won't have an upgradable
system, something is in bp for n-1 could be:
a) in core for n
b) in update for n
c) in bp for n
In any of them it should be upgradable, so why shouldn't we
follow the versioning policy for updates, since a bp for mageia n-1
*is* an upgrade/update in mageia n?

ennael could we add a point in tonight meeting? i seem we talked
a lot and reached no decisions...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20120613/93ff3496/attachment.asc>

More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list