[Mageia-dev] packaging amrwb ?

Oliver Burger oliver.bgr at googlemail.com
Wed Jun 20 14:05:44 CEST 2012

Am 20.06.2012 13:45, schrieb Simple w:
> Appears to be different from faac case, because this one doesnt have a
> GPL license, so it could be in non-free repository.
The issue with faac is not, that it's partly GPL, the problem is, it's 
partly nonfree.
Packages that are _pure_ OpenSource and patented are going into tainted.
Packages that are non-free and not patented are going into nonfree.
But this is nonfree and patented, unless someeone can prove me and 
wikipedia wrong.
So it's a no-go.


Oliver Burger aka obgr_seneca

Mageia contributor

More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list