[Mageia-dev] Mageia 3 feature proposals review
olav at vitters.nl
Wed Jun 27 18:45:10 CEST 2012
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:35:35AM +0200, AL13N wrote:
> I thought they were planning on signing all the stuff after grub2 as well?
> I have no trouble having signed bootloader. but i would prefer it to be from a
> completely free CA. ie: NOT from microsoft.
Then you need to convince all the hardware manufacturers to put your key
in their hardware, as explained in the blogpost. Seems really unlikely
> above signing from microsoft, I would even prefer to have a documentation that
> requests to disable Secure Boot, then generate your own key and adding that,
> and then setting up Secure Boot again, with your own personal signed stuff.
Thought disabling secure boot means first booting?
> of course, if there was an independant org that had it's CA in all hardware,
> and signed all free OSes, that would be alot better.
There is none.
More information about the Mageia-dev