[Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache

Guillaume Rousse guillomovitch at gmail.com
Fri Mar 16 10:02:06 CET 2012


Le 16/03/2012 03:01, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
>> So I'd rather revert the change, and make lighttpd autonomous also.
>> Unless someone can convince me there is an advantage having lighttpd
>> executing as 'apache' :)
>
> The web applications policy has files being owned by 'apache' user, and
> I don't see how that could work if lighttpd used a different user:
> https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Web_applications_policy
This policy was crafted with apache in mind only, not all available web 
servers. And its explicitely refers to apache integration, not generic 
webserver compatibility. For instance, the configuration file provided 
is apache-specific. Even if we have compatible file permissions, and if 
we asked packagers to also provide a default lighttpd configuration file 
(slighly more work), that would still be mostly theorical compatibility 
without actual testing from the packagers (many more work).

So, rather than a potential compatibility, without documented limits, 
should we rather not make clear than adapting our web applications 
package to any other web server than apache is fully up to the end user ?

-- 
BOFH excuse #202:

kernel panic: write-only-memory (/dev/wom0) capacity exceeded.


More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list