[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue

Frank Griffin ftg at roadrunner.com
Wed Oct 3 16:19:58 CEST 2012


On 10/03/2012 10:07 AM, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>
> OK, let's vote here:
> - how many people for using 'tainted' ?
> - how many people for using 'non-free' ?
>
> Any solution involving technical changes doesn't qualify for a simple 
> solution, and doesn't seems worth the effort for just a single package...
>
As far as I'm concerned, making it possible for mirror admins to stay 
within the law trumps ease of use for FOSS believers (i. e. not having 
to check the license of a tainted package).

So, if we're excluding technical solutions,  I vote tainted.

However, I still think that Col's solution would be preferable, for the 
same reasons that I think a free/nonfree switch in the installer is 
preferable to excluding nonfree code from our media and installs 
unilaterally.


More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list