[Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb?

[atilla ontas]

2010/9/26 francisco monge a <hellfranciscodrake at gmail.com>:
> El Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:03:07 +0200
> Sandro Cazzaniga <cazzaniga.sandro at gmail.com> escribió:
>> Le Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:44:38 -0400,
>> Hoyt Duff <hoytduff at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> > only thing i hate about mandriva is its rpm based packages
>> > i prefer apt and deb pe
>>
>> It's a fork of Mandriva. Mandriva use rpm so mageia will probably use
>> rpm too.
>> Without it, we have to kill urpm* projects....
>
> You can not even doubt that we must use packet types, the MCC is
> designed to use and manage RPRDRAKE such packages. To change should
> start from the ground, at least I guess. The advantages of RPR on the
> DEB packages are not obvious but they exist and why many users prefer.
> My apologies to those who think differently but almost absurd to
> discuss this as the heart of this distro are RPM packages, its ease of
> use and installation.
>

INsteadf cussing rpm or deb package formats w should consider to use
apt-rpm like PclinuxOs does. Using synaptic and apt wolud be wonderful