[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo

[source_ reloaded]

sorry but I don’t like


 I want to point to skiper's blog, who gave the whole "Logo" issue some
>>> thought. It is titled, "Mageia logo - I don't like it".
>>>
>>> But what he writes is very different from the usual "I don't like it,
>>> it's ugly" posts. I explains in detail why he does not like it and why
>>> he thinks it is not a good choice based on objective reasons. Although
>>> I do not share his opinion I want to give credit to him because he did
>>> not just complain, he put some thinking and time into explaining his
>>> opinion.
>>>
>>> BTW: He explicitely states that he does not complain about the
>>> decision finding process.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-with-it/
>>>
>>> Good reading, even if it is not my opinion :)
>>>
>> Thank you for commenting and expressing your point of view as well. ;-)
>>
>> I did complete my article a little bit more for two other kinds of logo to
>> fit in, including some details I though interesting. I should have mentioned
>> all this before, and I also precised a little bit more my thought of the
>> chosen logo.
>>
>> But none of the less, it is still worth remembering there has been a lot
>> of work made on Mageia generally as well as on the logo. So I renew my
>> confidence and encouragements towards those who currently work hard on the
>> project. :-)
>>
>> Now, this is just intended to offer a little though about all this logo
>> episode, nothing more.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Skiper.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mandriva Linux 2010 spring + kde 4.3.2
> think it,be diferent,be gnu/linux
>
>


-- 
Mandriva Linux 2010 spring + kde 4.3.2
think it,be diferent,be gnu/linux
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/f1732db1/attachment.html>