[Mageia-discuss] Vote for board

[Remco Rijnders]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:49:27PM +0100, Michael wrote in 
<1331552967.1167.212.camel at liliana.cdg.redhat.com>:
>>
>> I think what I tried to say... it is good to have the policies and
>> procedures clear up front and to stick to them, even when they might seem
>> overly bureaucratic to us now. In the future, when we might face issues,
>> it is good to have established procedures we can point to instead of
>> having people claim "but you did x back then".
>
>Nice try, but as seen on -dev, when i try to follow the procedure and
>rules, people complain, and when i don't, people ask me to do so.

Well, first of all, people will always find something to complain about...

That said, and assuming you are referring to what I think you are 
referring to... I think in that case the confusion is about what the 
policy really is. The criteria as mentioned in the last meeting seem to 
differ from what I read on the -dev list now. I don't care much one way or 
the other, but I think here too being clear on the policy is the most 
important thing.

Secondly, and I do mean this in the nicest and most constructive way... 
it would not hurt if also other developers / council members would speak 
their mind when such things come up. For this we need 1) them to speak up 
more, 2) for you to not to speak on their behalf when you have not 
consulted them yet.

Cheers,

Remco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </pipermail/mageia-discuss/attachments/20120312/c092e217/attachment.asc>