[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
neoclust.mageia at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 01:57:42 CEST 2010
2010/10/6 Olivier Thauvin <nanardon at nanardon.zarb.org>
> * Buchan Milne (bgmilne at multilinks.com) wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 5 October 2010 23:39:09 Tux99 wrote:
> > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, nicolas vigier wrote:
> > > 3) I mentioned earlier that the packager would need to use good
> > > judgement and not include major incompatible version changes
> > You are aware that this is significantly more work than 'mdvsys submit -t
> > 2010.1 --define section=main/backports $package' (after some minimal
> testing of
> > course)?
> This part of the discuss let me think something.
> We have both some people wanting huge set of backport and other wanting
> long life release w/o change except security/bug fix.
> So, why not alternate both, 1 release with backports denied but long
> life, and the 2nd with backports and update but during a shorter period.
> (X.0 would be the new distro with backports, X.1 the one more servers
> oriented or enterprise).
> What do you think ?
i am not pro this, i think this is better to have the same policy for all
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mageia-dev