[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla

[Samuel Verschelde]

Le jeudi 23 décembre 2010 20:44:14, Michael scherer a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:34:35PM +0100, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
> > Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 21:25:39, Michael scherer a écrit :
> > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 01:55:02PM +0100, Frederic Janssens wrote:
> > > > On 2010-12-22, Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
> > > > > Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 00:32 +0100, Frederic Janssens a 
écrit :
> > > > On https://qa.mandriva.com/ anything goes.
> > > > To permit consistent searches I think we should standardise.
> > > > The aim would to be to as specific as needed but not more;
> > > > as far as I know that would be :
> > > > 
> > > > name-version-release
> > > > 
> > > > unless the bug is architecture specific, where we would have :
> > > > 
> > > > name-version-release.architecture
> > > 
> > > There is already a "architecture" field, afaik, as well as a version
> > > field, no ?
> > > 
> > > ( I didn't check as I refuse to enter my password over a insecured http
> > > session ).
> > > 
> > > And I think that giving rpm ( and not srpm ) will make search a little
> > > bit complex in some corner cases ( can will also cause problem for the
> > > next point ).
> > 
> > So you think the (S)RPM field should only contain SRPM filenames ?
> 
> No, just the srpm name.
> At least from a data point of view.
> 
> > If yes, I agree with that, because as Frederic stated above, in current
> > Mandriva bugzilla, there's no enforced rule for that. You can put
> > anything in the field, and you often end up with rpm filenames, or
> > simple package names (e.g. "virtualbox").
> > 
> > However asking bug reporters to know the SRPM is too much, so this rule
> > can only be enforced on Packagers and Triage Team side I think. This is
> > already how it works on qa.mandriva.com : if you know the SRPM, you put
> > it, if not someone will triage and do it for you.
> 
> Well, that's more a UI question, and so it should be decoralated from the
> way we store data in the DB.  ( now, it may be hard to achieve, but I am
> sure that templates + ajax could do miracle, like "enter the name of rpm
> here" and have it searched with js to fill the proper input ).

I remember some years ago you could choose the exact version of the package 
for which you reported a bug, from a list. I agree that improving the UI side 
helpers could be useful.

Regards

Samuel Verschelde