[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron

Marek Laane bald at smail.ee
Sat Jul 16 20:24:49 CEST 2011


2011/7/16 Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <beranger5ca at yahoo.ca>

> >Well, LO is probably exception, AFAIK mostly due to its building troubles
> but
>
> >at least KDE has always had almost all alphas and betas and RCs in
> cooker/cauldron
>
> KDE is the main reason I'm using Cauldron.
>
> Since KDE 4.0.0, KDE is never "good/stable enough", so it _always_ makes
> sense
> to install all the RCs.
>
> (There are some DEs that are never "stable enough". Or, when they are
> really
> polished -- think KDE 3.5.10 or GNOME 2.32 --, there are some benevolent
> teams
> of dictators who decide to jump to an unstable boat -- thinl KDE 4.0.0,
> GNOME 3.0.)
>
> I've seen no betas here, only RCs (4.6.3 -> 4.6.4 -> 4.6.90 -> 4.6.95).
> Fair enough.
>
> Not in Mageia, yet... But Mandriva had e.g after 4.5.0 4.5.65, 4.5.67,
4.5.68. 4.5.71, 4.5.74 and so on - i.e. surely betas and IINM some alphas,
too. So it surely is not so rare to have in development version as
cooker/cauldron quite unstable versions.


> R-C
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20110716/90b705b3/attachment.html>


More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list