[Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums

[atilla ontas]

What about Debian or ArchLinux organisation scheme with users
interaction? We can digg those to find a way of organisation. In my
opinion, two should be three parts of a decision maker group. Call it
assembly or whatever you want. First, members from Mageia developers
(coders, packagers, web site and wiki developers etc.), members from
local users communities.  I don't know who are the advocates as
mentioned in announcement. If Mageia will be a community driven
project and not a company product there must be community members in
board. I think %50-%50 developer-community ratio is fine. Local
communities should elect their representive by themselves. We can
elect our representive for 2 years. Thats how i think the decision
maker board should formed in.


OFFTOPİC:  Mageia name is a bit weird for Turkish users. We even can't
pronounce them like European language speakers. If someone asked me
the distro name i'd rather prefer Magic Wand Linux...