[Mageia-discuss] Need help recovering execute permission on local files

Alejandro López listas.apl at gmail.com
Mon Jun 11 14:58:41 CEST 2012


On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Len Lawrence <tarazed25 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/06/12 12:28, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:33:46 +0100
>> Len Lawrence<tarazed25 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>  After a warm reboot this morning I found that I no longer had the
>>> ability to run my own commands even though the permissions are correct
>>> and ownership is lcl (uid=500).  User system commands are OK so
>>> running a script via ruby for instance works but trying to execute the
>>> script by itself fails even though it is fully executable.  This
>>> applies to all my local bin commands.  Command aliases however do work
>>> as long as they do not involve running any of my bin files.
>>>
>>> Even root cannot execute these bin commands; same message "Permission
>>> denied".
>>>
>>> In addition the system has switched me to autologin.  Trying to run
>>> mcc I was told it cannot be run in console mode (??).  If I login as
>>> su mcc comes up in console mode, which I am not inclined to use.
>>>
>>> The hostname on this machine is belexeuli; this does not appear in
>>> the command prompt: [lcl at localhost ~]$
>>>
>>> After su: [root at belexeuli lcl]#
>>>
>>> This may all have something to do with my adding groups and changing
>>> group ids yesterday in my attempts to implement a viable sudoers
>>> command.  It worked and I could log out and in again without any
>>> problems.  I even managed a reboot without trouble but today is
>>> another story.
>>>
>>> I suspect that solving these multiple problems is beyond my technical
>>> skill even with help so a full reinstall is probably the best bet.
>>> However I will await any comments.
>>>
>>> Len
>>>
>>>  You say that the permissions are correct, but do they include execute
>> permissions?  The prompt difference may be simply that root's prompt is
>> no longer the same as a user's prompt.  It is set by a config file for
>> each user.  You can see the code for it by typing "echo $PS1" In my
>> case, that gives "[\u@\h \W]\$"  The \h puts in the hostname.  You can
>> change it for the current session by typing at the user prompt:
>>
>>     PS1="[\u@\h \W]\$"
>>
>> You can make that permanent by putting it in your .bash_profile, where
>> it should override the other at your next login, but really, it is only
>> a workaround.
>>
>> With so many issues, I would do a full reinstall, but more knowledgeable
>> people tell me it is the easy way out.
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Doug.
>>
> Yes, all the commands have execute permission.  I have been using my local
> bin directory for years and I have never had execute refused so this must
> reflect some deep system level screwup relating to lcl and maybe something
> in pam.d.  That is unknown country for me.
> Until yesterday there was no lcl group, only user lcl.  The group for lcl
> was live, which I have
> removed from my group list.  live was my primary group, now it is lcl
> which I added yesterday.  Ownership of my files is now lcl:lcl and in
> /home/lcl/bin the permissions are nearly all 755.
> Note that I can chmod -x <file> and chmod +x <file> but that does not
> change anything.
>
> I notice that home now contains a "live" directory: /home/live, ownership
> lcl:lcl, containing tmp and nothing else.  Now that is weird.
>
> The difference in the root and user prompts is probably related to the
> fact that root cannot access the user's X display.  I have seen that sort
> of thing before when the two have been using different hostnames.  I think
> that root is now looking at belexeuli:0 whereas the user has for some
> reason reverted to localhost:0.  Attempts at using the gui by root throw up
> protocol errors.
>
> As you say, a reinstall looks like the best way out.  More knowledgeable
> people would probably know just where to look for the root of the
> problem(s) but even after 21 years experience of Unix and Linux I know next
> to nothing about access and security policies.
>


Maybe it was somehow mounted with the -noexec flag?

Alejandro.



>
> Cheers
>
> Len
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/mageia-discuss/attachments/20120611/f950e8a6/attachment.html>


More information about the Mageia-discuss mailing list