[Mageia-dev] i686 must be Pentium II ?
Giuseppe Ghibò
ghibomgx at gmail.com
Sun Sep 26 14:25:43 CEST 2010
2010/9/26 Thomas Backlund <tmb at iki.fi>
Giuseppe Ghibò skrev 26.9.2010 02:09:
>
>
> Not exactly. I'm not talking in just using -march=<something> but in
>> also pushing -mfpmath=sse -msse (and maybe -msse2) , which should be
>> much more than JUST 1-2% (1-2% is usually the benchmark
>> tolerance)...
>>
>
> Well, here is a simple fact.
>
> Yes, going for i686 + SSE2 would/could give some benefits,
>
> BUT
>
> It would close support for all theese:
> - Intel i586 (all)
>
- Intel Pentium Pro
> - Intel Pentium II
> - Intel Pentium III (Including some Pentium D)
> - 32-bit AMD Athlon
> - AMD Geode
> - VIA C3
> - Transmeta Crusoe
>
> So, thats not an option.
>
As I said I would see someone with such hardware, taking a CD of latest MDV
or cooker and try to install to do something and do a report.
That reminds me also one suggestion. If someone has old hardware that not
in use anymore then could be donated to who is willing to test the latest
MDV|Mageia on it. It's not ironic (I think this is a brainstorming), or I'm
not kidding, but there could be an wiki hardware section for that. For old
hardware schools and institutes or corporations have even to pay for
dismantling: such hardware is usually recycled for:
a) extracting gold (there are nowadays new chemical processes that found
more affordable to extract gold from old PCs than from mines)
b) avoid pollutions with the lead, plastics they contain, if thrown in the
dumpster etc. (note there isn't just the CPU, but also CRT monitors,
printers, disks, etc.)
IIRC there is a EU law that if you buy a new PC the vendor is obeyed to
retire the old one and take care for the dismantling.
>
>
> Now what about only i686 + SSE then?
> It would still close support for all theese:
> - Intel i586 (all)
> - Some Intel Pentium D
> - 32-bit AMD Athlon < XP/MP
> - AMD Geode < NX
> - VIA C3 (Samuel* and Ezra)
> - Transmeta Crusoe
>
> So, still not an option.
>
>
> Now what about only i686 then?
> It would still close support for all theese:
> - Intel i586 (all)
> - Some Intel Pentium D
> - AMD Geode < NX
> - VIA C3 (Samuel* and Ezra)
> - Transmeta Crusoe
>
> So, still not an option.
>
>
> And then to point out some other facts:
>
> Some of the benefits are already accounted for like you noted earlier:
>
> "Of course we shouldn't forget that the MDV had already a system for
> providing optimized (look at /usr/lib/sse2 for instance) version of
> libraries according to instruction set supported."
>
> And many applications capable of utilizing sse2 and other instruction sets
> already have runtime detection support, so no problem there.
>
>
> So, where does that leave us?
>
> Simple.
> For 32bit installs, we will still support i586 as base.
> For 64bit installs, it's simple as x86_64 is SSE2 by default.
>
>
> Now, _if_ the Mageia community gets enough developers to think of _and_
> support a "light netbook/legacy edition", then maybe we can think of doing a
> i586/i686 split, but for now we will use i586 as base.
>
>
> And many of the users wanting i686/sse2 already have hardware capable of
> running x86_64, so that's what they should do, as there is where the future
> is.
>
>
You are forgetting a midrange. Which is the midrange of not the latest
hardware but a memory around 2-4GB RAM. In that set a 32bit OS is still
consuming 30-50% fewer memory than 64bit.
As I said to complete the circle it is needed to provide on a per
--target|dialect .rpm package for the kernel as well as for the glibc. We
have just to ensure the targets and fix compilation errors (though that
wouldn't resolve the problem of bloatware distro).
Bye
Giuseppe.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20100926/5b597a0c/attachment.html>
More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list