[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile

Maarten Vanraes maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
Thu Feb 10 21:24:16 CET 2011


Op donderdag 10 februari 2011 19:57:08 schreef Dexter Morgan:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Maarten Vanraes
> 
> <maarten.vanraes at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Op donderdag 10 februari 2011 10:34:48 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
> >> Le jeudi 10 février 2011 10:15:59, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
> >> > On 9 February 2011 21:52,  <root at mageia.org> wrote:
> >> > > update version in Makefile
> >> > > 
> >> > > Modified Paths
> >> > > 
> >> > > drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
> >> > > 
> >> > > Modified: drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
> >> > > ===================================================================
> >> > > --- drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile      2011-02-09 20:24:08 UTC
> >> > > (rev 495) +++ drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile      2011-02-09
> >> > > 20:52:01 UTC (rev 496) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> >> > > -VERSION = 2011.0
> >> > > +VERSION = 1
> >> > > 
> >> > >  PRODUCT = drakx-installer-advertising
> >> > 
> >> > I don't know if that has already been discussed somewhere (at least
> >> > I didn't remember it), since the "year.month" scheme is widely used
> >> > (mandriva, ubuntu, phoronix, ...), why not stick with it?
> >> > 
> >> > on the other hand, "traditionnal" versioning is used by FC, Debian so
> >> > I don't have strong opinion about any of these.
> >> > WDYT?
> >> 
> >> I saw no public discussion about it (maybe in a meeting for which I
> >> didn't read the logs). I like having the year in release version, but I
> >> infered from what I saw that version 1 seems to be what has been
> >> chosen. However, that may be to late to discuss since the alpha is due
> >> in 5 days from now.
> >> 
> >> Samuel
> > 
> > i was under the opinion that people said "Release 1" as a temporary
> > measure, until the discussion had been settled...
> > 
> > i too prefer the year in the release, makes it easier to remember.
> 
> i hardly see how this is easier to remember.
> I really like the way fedora does F14, F15, ...
> 
> 
> but this is just my opinion :)

well, tbf, will it be ok to have F143 in the future? it seems a bit ... 
languish ... to me.


More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list