[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile

[Dexter Morgan]

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Maarten Vanraes
<maarten.vanraes at gmail.com> wrote:
> Op donderdag 10 februari 2011 19:57:08 schreef Dexter Morgan:
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Maarten Vanraes
>>
>> <maarten.vanraes at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Op donderdag 10 februari 2011 10:34:48 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
>> >> Le jeudi 10 février 2011 10:15:59, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
>> >> > On 9 February 2011 21:52,  <root at mageia.org> wrote:
>> >> > > update version in Makefile
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Modified Paths
>> >> > >
>> >> > > drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Modified: drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
>> >> > > ===================================================================
>> >> > > --- drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile      2011-02-09 20:24:08 UTC
>> >> > > (rev 495) +++ drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile      2011-02-09
>> >> > > 20:52:01 UTC (rev 496) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> >> > > -VERSION = 2011.0
>> >> > > +VERSION = 1
>> >> > >
>> >> > >  PRODUCT = drakx-installer-advertising
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't know if that has already been discussed somewhere (at least
>> >> > I didn't remember it), since the "year.month" scheme is widely used
>> >> > (mandriva, ubuntu, phoronix, ...), why not stick with it?
>> >> >
>> >> > on the other hand, "traditionnal" versioning is used by FC, Debian so
>> >> > I don't have strong opinion about any of these.
>> >> > WDYT?
>> >>
>> >> I saw no public discussion about it (maybe in a meeting for which I
>> >> didn't read the logs). I like having the year in release version, but I
>> >> infered from what I saw that version 1 seems to be what has been
>> >> chosen. However, that may be to late to discuss since the alpha is due
>> >> in 5 days from now.
>> >>
>> >> Samuel
>> >
>> > i was under the opinion that people said "Release 1" as a temporary
>> > measure, until the discussion had been settled...
>> >
>> > i too prefer the year in the release, makes it easier to remember.
>>
>> i hardly see how this is easier to remember.
>> I really like the way fedora does F14, F15, ...
>>
>>
>> but this is just my opinion :)
>
> well, tbf, will it be ok to have F143 in the future? it seems a bit ...
> languish ... to me.
>

and mageia 3501.1 is something better ? :)

come on  you have just personnal feeling here not something with arguments.