[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name

Colin Guthrie mageia at colin.guthr.ie
Wed Sep 5 10:03:47 CEST 2012

'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Thierry Vignaud
>> <thierry.vignaud at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 4 September 2012 16:11,  <root at mageia.org> wrote:
>>>> Revision 5642 Author rda Date 2012-09-04 16:11:36 +0200 (Tue, 04 Sep 2012)
>>>> Log Message
>>>> skip packages with no name
>>> Is that possible?
>> Well, I am guilty of not having checked further why, but it happens
>> that at the end of the list of packages being built, we used to have
>> all the info, except the package name. So it may be that it was
>> mis-parsed, but why on these specific occurrences? is it related to
>> the fact that it's "old packages" (submitted about 48 hours before)
>> and that some parts of the related files were already removed?
> It is related, files are not removed but to get information we do a
> find of files with a limit on mtime, so we are missing some
> information if they were submitted over 2 days ago but built less than
> 2 days ago
>> By the way, there are some builds that get a strangely reported build
>> duration (15588 days; always the same value when it occurs). I didn't
>> investigate yet.

So 15588 would be days since epoch. I guess it's the same as Pascal's
comment. If it was submitted over 2 days ago we might not read the
submit time and it ends up getting a timestamp of 0 and thus 15588 days
to build.



Colin Guthrie

Day Job:
  Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
Open Source:
  Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
  PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
  Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/

More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list