misc at zarb.org
Mon Oct 25 18:37:55 CEST 2010
Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 18:24 +0200, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
> 2010/10/25 Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org>:
> > Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 11:37 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
> >> Exactly. I'm getting more and more the sense that there should be a
> >> separate bugzilla section for documentation, which would include
> >> packaging descriptions.
> > Ie, a separate section ?
> > What would it achieve that the current bugzilla system would not ?
> I don't think it would help. There is (was) the tag "Doc" (or similar)
> in Bugzilla which already marked the bug as something related to
> documentation. Somebody who is concerned and ignored that would also
> ignore a separate section and vice versa.
> I like a more general approach involving the users and packagers likewise:
> - see a lack of or bad description in the "Individual package
> selection and/or rpmdrake
> - report it as a bug, giving the necessary explanation (in an ideal
> world offer a good description yourself)
> - triage team dedicates the bug to either the packager or the
> developper who inserts the description in the installer.
I would even add a tag on it, for junior job, or something like that. Ie
small changes that can be done by newer packagers, just to learn how to
change a package without requiring specific technical skills.
More information about the Mageia-discuss