[Mageia-discuss] Logo proposals discussion
Hoyt Duff
hoytduff at gmail.com
Sat Nov 20 00:01:51 CET 2010
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Enrico Gsell
<thecandyman666 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:57:35 -0600
>> From: spock at evansville.net
>> To: mageia-discuss at mageia.org
>> Subject: Re: [Mageia-discuss] Logo proposals discussion
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Thorsten van Lil wrote:
>>
>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: mageia-discuss-bounces at mageia.org [mailto:mageia-
>>>> discuss-bounces at mageia.org] Im Auftrag von Wayne Sallee
>>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. November 2010 13:24
>>>> An: Mageia general discussions
>>>> Betreff: Re: [Mageia-discuss] Logo proposals discussion
>>>>
>>>> Pascal Terjan wrote on 11/19/2010 06:53 AM:
>>>>> followed by
>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/54240048@N08/5017306285/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yea, I think that one looks nice too.
>>>>
>>>> Wayne Sallee
>>>> Wayne at WayneSallee.com
>>>
>>> But stars arn't allowed I thought and as mentioned in the
>>> guidelines.
>>
>> I don't think they're actually barred. I think a number of people just thought it wouldn't be a good idea if we want
>> to differentiate ourselves from Mandriva, which I think we do. That's why I wouldn't vote for that one.
>>
>>> My favorites are:
>>> 1. http://www.flickr.com/photos/ofaurax/5127775007/
>>> 2. http://www.flickr.com/photos/ueros/5099707080/
>>> 3. http://www.flickr.com/photos/54167983@N08/5038318001/
>>> 4. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tigger-gg/5027064477/
>>
>> I don't like the other three but I like no. 3. It would look even better, in my opinion, if the encircling ribbon
>> was less visually overpowering, framing rather than dominating the central sphere. Also, and this is true of many
>> of the submissions, the lettering tries too hard to be original at the expense of legibility and attractiveness.
>> Any number of more or less standard fonts would be better. (I like Cheltenham myself.) It's the logo itself that
>> needs to stand out and be distinctive. "Mageia" isn't the logo.
>>
>> Dale Huckeby
>
>
> For number 3 i agree with the logo, but i absolutely don't like the font.
> Those are my favorites:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ofaurax/5127775007/in/pool-mageia-artSimple but still modern.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/54316230@N06/5141934927/in/pool-mageia-artI like that mix of different symbols, shows the variety of the distribution.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/54167983@N08/5038318001/in/pool-mageia-artGreat modern looking logo, but still i am not really happy with the font.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/54240048@N08/5013673327/in/pool-mageia-artJust somehow like it ;)
> Kind regards,Enrico
>
>
>
>
>> For number 3 i agree with the logo, but i absolutely don't like the font.
I like that as well, but don't like the color. It looks too passive.;
not exciting
--
Hoyt
More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list