[Mageia-dev] Mageia repository sections, licenses, restrictions, firmware etc
bgmilne at multilinks.com
Wed Oct 13 10:19:17 CEST 2010
On Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:52:58 Tux99 wrote:
> Quote: marc wrote on Tue, 12 October 2010 18:42
> > Unfortunately, if this is done, I will no longer be able to install
> > legally any Mageia due to our laws. I think it is best if these are not
> > installed but let users know where to get them, mostly through PLF.
> How do you expect Mageia to verify each single package to make sure it
> complies with the laws in ALL countries of the world?
So, because we can't comply with all laws in all coutnries, we should violate
everyone we possibly can?
> Mageia should make sure that the packages comply with French law, but
> that's it.
If Mageia wants mirrors in countries with strong IP protection laws (including
copyright, software patent) and anti-circumvention laws, then IMHO, there does
need to be a split, so mirror maintainers can decide which risks they can
For example, in the DMCA case, I believe US mirrors hosting libdvdcss could be
> You can still install Mageia and then remove the packages that are
> problematic in your country, I very much doubt your laws are that
> draconian that you can't even do that.
> Mageia could include an option during install to exclude the well-known
> problematic packages from installation to make this easier for people that
> live in countries with restrictive laws.
> > When I install Mandriva Free for people, I will let them know where the
> > PLF repos are and the files needed and they install these themselves.
> This is a major hassle for new/inexperienced users and IMHO should be
Maybe it can be improved *to some extent*, by asking the user if they want to
add additional repositories.
> > If Mageia packages include unlicensed software and codecs, the Mageia
> > brand may be held legally responsible for marketing software in
> > countries where the laws do not permit this.
> This is nonsense, Mageia can only be held responsible in France based on
> French law (as long as Mageia isn't planning subsidiaries in outher
> countries, which IMHO is unlikely and completely unnecessary for a
> non-profit association).
Anssi discussed various reasons packages aren't in Main or Contrib in
Mandriva, and you devolve this discussion to be purely about software patents.
However, the issues are:
-non-free software for which we have no re-distribution license (e.g. Flash,
we may be able to request a license, but most likely it would not allow Mageia
to distribute a distribution license to 3rd parties - specifically mirrors).
-free software which violates anti-circumvention or other copyright protection
laws (e.g. libdvdcss, libaacs, libbdplus etc.)
-free software which infringes software patents
Let's discuss the first two issues as well, as they can't be dismissed, and
put real risk to anyone distributing the software (magazines, mirrors, sites
More information about the Mageia-dev