misc at zarb.org
Mon Oct 25 17:50:10 CEST 2010
Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 11:37 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
> Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
> > 2010/10/24 Michael Scherer<misc at zarb.org>:
> >> Well, writing better description is a task that do not requires
> >> technical knowledge, and that any packagers could do, if people send a
> >> patch.
> >> Since I never received anything for my own packages for this kind of
> >> problem, shall I assume that my packages are fine ?
> > A typical case of failed communication. It has been written many times
> > that package descriptions in the installer and also some in rpmdrake
> > are less than they should be. What does it tell me when I look at the
> > description and all I see is "an important package you should install
> > it" ? But what does it do? Brew coffee?
> > IIRC there has been a bug report about it. Too tired now to search for
> > it, sorry.
> Exactly. I'm getting more and more the sense that there should be a
> separate bugzilla section for documentation, which would include
> packaging descriptions.
Ie, a separate section ?
What would it achieve that the current bugzilla system would not ?
More information about the Mageia-discuss